Mumbai-Central.comWhere Mumbaikars meet |
Hello, Only a lawyer would muddy the water in this way by bringing in facts irrelevant to the original discussion. I do not see anything wrong in the original article. There definitely is no need to see WHO is responsible for Holding up OTHER articles of the constitution. If I kill a deer, your killing a horse does not become justified. Thursday, February 7, 2008, 2:22:05 AM, you wrote: > A careful reading of the above would show that the year of marriage of > anybody is irrelevant to the generic and general statement that [paraphrased > for sake of simplicity] states that the implementation of Article 44 is > being opposed (even) in the 59th year of our Constitution [meaning, > thereby, even after such a long time, in 2008]. -- Best regards, Mean ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The silliest woman can manage a clever man, but it needs a very clever woman to manage a fool. - Rudyard Kipling ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To join/leave, use the form at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/#options This list is archived at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html
Use the form below to subscribe or unsubscribe to the list.
|
Site directory
|
Today's news
|
Film reviews
|
likhaai
|
nukkad
|
Stocks
|
Discussion boards
|
Photos
|
Puzzles
Restaurant Guide | Train Guide | Bus Guide | Mumbai Information | Image Galleries About us | Advertise here! | Feedback Donate Sponsored Link: Are There Lucky Planets In Your Astrological Marriage House? | Articles on travel and USA-specific tips |
|
|
Get notified about site updates To get updates about the Mumbai-Central.com site via email (only 1-2 messages per month), sign up! |
|