Re:

["Anil Nair" <nairani@geodc.patni.com>]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the day:  No personal attacks and abusive behavior.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can Anyone Give me a forceful argument as to why pornography is
objectionable?

I agree that pornography does come across as being a degradation of  man
/woman for commercial purposes.
By providing an audience for such material we give consent to the production
and propagation of the same.
Let us assume this is an instance of people driven by their need to sustain
themselves -  to feed clothe themselves - and their loved ones , agree to
forgo their sense of shame and propriety.
It is exploitation allright .
If that is the case then the use of stunt doubles should also come under
protest ,because the way i see
it in both Action sequences as well as Titillating scenes the viewer derives
vicarious pleasure , one kind of role might be distasteful alright
 but then the stuntmen too are forced to risk their lives for our
pleasure.

Does money and recognition come in the way of all this as well ? is it that
stars like
marilyn monroe/ sharon stone are better off than their colleagues who are
unknown and paid little?They were no less revealing for sure.

All in all its way to easy talk against porn because i know no one who will
speak for it in public and i know no one who does not derive pleasure from
the same


anil






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Subscribe [Unsubscribe] send a blank message to 
        nukkad-list-request@mumbai-central.com 
with the word 'subscribe' ['unsubscribe'] (without quotes) in the Subject 
of your message.
The list is archived at  http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html