[nukkad] The abduction of Daniel Pearl

["Net Geek" <>]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the day:  If you are going on vacation, remember to (temporarily) 
unsubscribe from "nukkad". This will avoid a stuffed Inbox.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The abduction of Daniel Pearl - Rediff January 30 2002

Was it Jefferson or Lincoln who described the journalist as "a disturber of 
the peace, a roiler of nations"? Neither man is a hero in a dictatorship, 
but this is one description which has often been taken all too literally. 
Several members of the media fraternity have been jailed like common 
criminals for doing their job sincerely. And this brings up the case of the 
unfortunate Daniel Pearl.

Who is Mr Pearl? Some of you might have seen his name in print from time to 
time. He is the South Asia correspondent of The Wall Street Journal based in 
Mumbai. A few days ago, he was abducted while doing a story from Pakistan. 
And therein lies a tale...
In relating what follows, I would like to stress that I have never met 
Pearl. But I happen to know that Pearl, though based in Mumbai, knew certain 
people in Delhi (I shall not be more specific than that). Through this 
person (or persons) Pearl gained access to a report from Indian 
intelligence. This report gave the lie to claims made by the Pakistani 
authorities about clamping down on militant outfits.

Pearl did not immediately swallow this report. He insisted, as any 
responsible journalist should, that he would try to verify the tale. 
Specifically, he wanted to find out about the Bahawalpur connection for 
himself.

Bahawalpur, for the benefit of those who do not know, was the capital of a 
princely state in British India, noted chiefly for the eccentricity of some 
of its nawabs. It lies south of Multan, strategically located at a point 
close to the Indian states of Punjab and Rajasthan. More to the point, it is 
also, as Pearl found out, the operational headquarters of the 
Jaish-e-Mohammed.

On January 1, 2002, a story filed by Pearl from Bahawalpur featured 
prominently on the front page of the Asian edition of The Wall Street 
Journal. The headline summed it up: 'Militant Groups in Pakistan Thrive 
Despite Crackdown'. The sub-head read: 'Jaish-e-Mohammed Says It Is Still 
Operating After Police Detained Some Staff'.

The report proceeded to make several highly damaging accusations about the 
Pakistani government's efforts to rein in terrorism. Jaish-e-Mohammed 
representatives said the police "left behind enough people to keep the 
office running". When Pearl visited Bahawalpur, a "nearby Jaish-e-Mohammad 
regional center was still operating Thursday, its traditional recruiting 
day. The group's name has been painted over, but posters praising holy war 
are still hung inside. And a bank account that Jaish-e-Mohammad uses to 
solicit contributions remains open, despite a November order by Pakistan's 
central bank freezing the group's account."

Ordinarily, one might have dismissed this as nothing more than the standard 
Indian foreign office press release. But this is something more -- an 
independent report by a correspondent belonging to one of the most respected 
media groups in the United States. Having learned what was going on in 
Bahawalpur so openly, it was on the cards that Daniel Pearl would try to dig 
a little deeper. And this possibility posed a problem for several people...

Some days ago, Pearl was seized by person or persons unknown. The kidnapping 
has been attributed to terrorists. An anonymous message sent to the police 
and the media in Pakistan accuses the journalist of being a CIA agent and 
promises to mete out the same "inhumane" treatment to him as to the Al Qaeda 
prisoners being held by the United States. Is there more to the story of 
this supposed kidnapping than meets the eye?
I was in Washington shortly after Pearl's story came out and can personally 
testify to the embarrassment and rage it caused to the Pakistani 
representatives (as well as to those Americans in high places who continue 
to turn a blind eye to militant activities in Pakistan). But the Musharraf 
government certainly could not afford to detain or expel an American 
journalist, least of all one representing a journal as influential as The 
Wall Street Journal.

I am sure General Musharraf himself would never do something as silly as 
arrange for Pearl's convenient disappearance. But is he completely in charge 
of the situation? In his speech on January 12, the Pakistani leader 
regretfully admitted that the authority of the State had deteriorated. A 
section of Indian intelligence suspects that the hapless journalist has been 
spirited away by the Inter-Services Intelligence; others believe that it is 
actually terrorists who carried out the operation. Whichever it is, it 
underlines a couple of facts.
First, the fact that an American journalist of some repute can suddenly go 
missing in Pakistan is a reminder of the professional hazards of journalism 
in that country. Second, it questions the assumption that General Musharraf 
is in complete charge of his nation.

Some of my friends have wondered why the Western media has handled India so 
much more roughly than they do Pakistan. This has often been put down to the 
traditional leftist bias of the media reacting to the fact that a Bharatiya 
Janata Party-led government rules India today. Others say it is an implicit 
racism reacting to a new assertiveness in India's conduct of her affairs. I 
mean no disrespect to my foreign colleagues, but could there be a third 
reason, namely fear?

Journalists can write anything they choose about India without fear of 
retribution. (And many do just that!) But, as the case of the unhappy Daniel 
Pearl dramatically demonstrates, honest reporting on Pakistan can be a 
dangerous affair. Irrespective of whether the Inter-Services Intelligence or 
terrorists are at fault, Mr Pearl has been silenced quite effectively, has 
he not?

http://www.rediff.com/news/2002/jan/29flip.htm

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Subscribe [Unsubscribe] send a blank message to 
        nukkad-list-request@mumbai-central.com 
with the word 'subscribe' ['unsubscribe'] (without quotes) in the Subject 
of your message.
The list is archived at  http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html