Site directory | Today's news | Film reviews | likhaai | nukkad | Stocks | Discussion boards | Photos | Puzzles
Restaurant Guide | Train Guide | Bus Guide | Mumbai Information | Image Galleries

About us | Advertise here! | Feedback | Donate

Sponsored Links: Articles on travel within India and USA-specific tips | Are There Lucky Planets In Your Astrological Marriage House?

Mumbai-Central.com

Where Mumbaikars meet

Top: nukkad: archive: Thread Index



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nukkad] Not only those 2 but even ...............................



On Jan 8, 2008 9:28 AM, Ravi Menon  wrote:
> Shaurya,
> Open your eyes. When was the last time a cricketer in the "white
> world" copped a charge of cheating etc? Procter banned Rashid Latif
> for claiming a grounded catch, so where is the even handedness with
> Ponting?

Point taken there. I'd love to hear Proctor being interviewed on this.
I am fully for a similar ban on Ponting.

South Africa have dismantled apartheid but they are as racist as
> ever, why else did Kevin Petersen have to go to play in England? At
> least we havent used reservations in sport--- as yet!!!

Two ways of looking at this. Either Proctor is completely racist, or
he's sick of racism because of havng being discriminated against in
favour of blacks in South Africa, as he says. I dont believe in the
former because he's mature enough to not make baseless decisions as
regards to to ban on Bhajji after he saw what hapenned to Mike Deness
in 2001 (anyone who's heard of him since?). He is an official match
referee representing the ICC on a contractual basis. He is fully aware
that his decision, if found to be completely baseless, will have the
BCCI, a much stronger body anyday than the ICC, after his head.

> As to Bhajji and Symonds, the altercation if you call it that took
> place mid pitch where Bhajji had gone to hit Lee on the backside.

There altercation started at the strikers end, which continued as both
Bhajji and Symonds walked towards the non striker's. Hayden, Gilly,
Clarke were all closer then. I'm not saying they were right in their
claims. I'm just giving you a point of view about why they were
believed more than Tendulkar. Tendulkar can testify that Bhajji did
not say anything between say 10 Am - 10:05 Am..Hayden and Clarke and
Gilchrist can testify saying Bhajji said something at 9:58 AM, and
theres nothing that Tendulkar can do then.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
First rule of nukkad: You have to talk about nukkad
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To join/leave, use the form at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/#options
This list is archived at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html



Subscribe to nukkad

Use the form below to subscribe or unsubscribe to the list.

Your e-mail:

Choice:
Subscribe
Un-subscribe


[Prev Page][Next Page]

Main Index | Thread Index

Site directory | Today's news | Film reviews | likhaai | nukkad | Stocks | Discussion boards | Photos | Puzzles
Restaurant Guide | Train Guide | Bus Guide | Mumbai Information | Image Galleries

About us | Advertise here! | Feedback
Donate

Sponsored Link: Are There Lucky Planets In Your Astrological Marriage House? | Articles on travel and USA-specific tips
Get notified about site updates
To get updates about the Mumbai-Central.com site via email (only 1-2 messages per month), sign up!





Created and maintained by us