Re: [nukkad] Not only those 2 but even ...............................

[Shaurya <>]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> That's where my query was in the first place. What's wrong if a not-out
> batsman,
> given falsely out is called to resume batting even after the next batsman
> has faced a ball/s ?

Things like the new batsman having set himself in, having had a look
in at the wicket, the playign  conditions etc come in here. And
rightly so. No batsman likes to adjust to conditions time and time
again. That is why teams are so reluctant facing the last few overs in
a day after the opposition has been bowled out with only 5 overs
remaining. That is when the job of an opener becomes thankless.

Of course there can be a rule for a situation where a batsman is
recalled after the next wicket falls. But, from a personal point of
view, I'd prefer if that didnt happen. I play a lot of cricket, and
such a situation takes the life out of a match to some extent. Its
doesnt feel right.
Shaurya

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
First rule of nukkad: You have to talk about nukkad
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To join/leave, use the form at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/#options
This list is archived at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html