Re: [nukkad] Not only those 2 but even ...............................

[Shaurya <>]

> read (probably on cricinfo) that Ponting and Gilchrist only have
> Symonds word for it so that boils down to Bhajji vs. Symonds and
> Tendulkar vs. Hayden.
> Lets eliminate insulted and insultee which leaves Hayden vs. Tendulkar
> and now who would you believe?
>

Its not who vs who thats the problem. The question is when. Tendulkar
is not someone whose word wont be believed. But if the timings are
different in the two cases (if Hayden says he heard  Bhajji say it
before Tendulkar was within hearing range) then theres nothing
tendulkar can say that will make a difference to the case, is there?
Shaurya

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The truth is not always the same as the majority decision. 
- John Paul II: (1920-2005), the Pope 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To join/leave, use the form at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/#options
This list is archived at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html