Re: [nukkad] nuclear war consequences

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the day:  Prune messages that you are forwarding or replying to include 
only the relevant material.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dandavate, Vaibhav (CAP, GEFA, Contractor) wrote as follows:
> 1. What are India and Pakistan fighting over? Is it just a piece of
> Land, Kashmir?

No. It is idealogy, I guess.

> 2. Why does Pakistan want Kashmir? Is it just because, it's a Muslim
> dominated State?
> Reference:
http://rd.mailshell.com/www.guardian.co.uk/kashmir/Story/0,2763,201960,0
0.html

Apparently not so. I guess rulers there want to consolidate their own
position.

> 3. Is there no alternative to WAR?

WAR is always a viable alternative.

> Considering, India gives away Kashmir to Pakistan:
> 4.a. Will Pakistan stop all its Terrorist Activities?

No.

> 5.b. Will Pakistan's greed stop with Kashmir?

No.

> 5. Are any of the countries in a situation to bear the cost of a WAR,
> just a plain WAR, leave alone Nuclear?

It is a medicine. You have to decide what you need.

> 6. Most important, Is WAR going to solve the problems?

At least for few years say-10 to 20. As long as Pakistan will exist, you
have to take this kind of medicine at an interval of 10 to 20 years.

> I might Sound Stupid, but does anyone have answers to the above
> questions?

That is my guess. I am not a political analyst.

> Does anybody have Alternatives?

Yes, if you can wipe out Pakistan from the world map.

>
> Lets try to resolve the differences.

It is easier said than done.

--
Kailash N. Srivastava


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, use the form at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/#options
This list is archived at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html