Re: [nukkad] nuclear war consequences

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the day:  You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.
    --John Viscount Morley 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This-address-is-not-valid@srivastava.mailshell.com wrote:
> Dandavate, Vaibhav (CAP, GEFA, Contractor) wrote as follows:
> > 1. What are India and Pakistan fighting over? Is it just a piece of
> > Land, Kashmir?
> 
> No. It is idealogy, I guess.

It is not ideology, rather lack of an ideology.

India was instrumental in Separating East Pakistan and converting it to
independent Bangala Desh. Though it is strategically the best thing done
in last 54 years, yet looking at Pakistan's view point, it is indeed a
big shame for them.

They want to avenge it by chopping Kashmir away from India.

Fools have forgotten that 60 years ago, india, pakistan and Kashmir were
a single country. Thus, by killing Kashmiris, they are actually killing
their own brothers and sisters.

> > 2. Why does Pakistan want Kashmir? Is it just because, it's a Muslim
> > dominated State?

because it is easily accessible to Pakistan. It is easy to create havoc
in there. And part of it is alerady disputed. China also has its grains
to roast. The proverbial monkey in the fight of the cats over a piece of
bread.

After independence, It was left to independent rajgharana to decide
whether to stay independent or to accede to Pakistan or to India.

In India, Sardar Patel used forces to make every one fall in Line. A
case in contrast was Hyderabad, where there was a predominantly Hindu
population, but the king was Muslim so he wanted to accede to Pakistan
whereas public wanted to accede to India. Sardar patel send force and
made the nizam agree to accede to India.

Kashmir had the similar Dispute. Majority of population was muslim which
wanted to accede to Pakistan, but the king, Raja Hari Singh (?) was
hindu who wanted to accede to India. Papers were signed, but then
paksitani army invaded and war started till they covered and took
control of half the kashmir which was muslim dominated. That is called
POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) till now, and controlled by puppets of
Pakistan.

At that time, due to international pressure, it was decided that there
will be a plebiscite (sp?) public poll in which every kashmiri will be
asked to decide whether to accede to India or to Pakistan. It was not
done immediately due to charged up situation, and later on deferred
again and again.

Now Pakistan want that to be held, sure that the way muslim give birth
to children a dozen per muslim, per generation, there are enough to
ournumber hindus.

> > 3. Is there no alternative to WAR?
> 
> WAR is always a viable alternative.

War was never so near till now as it appears now. It has been seen as
the onl viable alternative by Pakistani rulers, so that they can hide
other vows of their country. India never wanted any war, not even today.

> > Considering, India gives away Kashmir to Pakistan:
> > 4.a. Will Pakistan stop all its Terrorist Activities?
> 
> No.

It will boost Pakistan's morale that their mean tactics work. They will
be encouraged to repeat the same in other parts of India and Afganistan
and will threat the peace of the world.

> > 5.b. Will Pakistan's greed stop with Kashmir?
> 
> No.

That is the point. Greed will get fuelled if they get Kashmir.

> > 5. Are any of the countries in a situation to bear the cost of a WAR,
> > just a plain WAR, leave alone Nuclear?
> 
> It is a medicine. You have to decide what you need.

For India, cost in terms of fighting terrorism and the loss due to havoc
brought about by the terrorist is becoming so high, that was seems 
cheaper. le alone peace of mind.

> > 6. Most important, Is WAR going to solve the problems?
> 
> At least for few years say-10 to 20. As long as Pakistan will exist, you
> have to take this kind of medicine at an interval of 10 to 20 years.

War will harm Pakistan more than it is going to harm India. Once snubbed
they will lick their wounds for a long time, and then will bite again.
Then next was will happen. It will continue till Pakistan cease to
exist.

> > I might Sound Stupid, but does anyone have answers to the above
> > questions?
> 
> That is my guess. I am not a political analyst.

We are giving our views. I don't think these can be called the ultimate
answer to the problem.

> > Does anybody have Alternatives?
> 
> Yes, if you can wipe out Pakistan from the world map.

Public awareness, world pressure, world peace, powerful United Nations.
ceasing national boundary.

But entire world has its selfish motives. In last phase of tension, Tony
Blair camX-Mozilla-Status: 0009eace, but he sold UK made fighter planes
to India.

> > Lets try to resolve the differences.
> 
> It is easier said than done.

Do give any action plan you have.

love.
-Rawat



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, use the form at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/#options
This list is archived at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html