[nukkad] Categories of critics

["Dr.M.C. Gupta" <>]

[This message contained attachments that have been removed.]


To what category of crtics we wish to belong?



Some criticise the content on academic lines, offering counterfacts with
authority/reference.



Some criticise not the content but discuss something unrelated or different
in the name of criticism.



Some don't have concrete criticism to offer but doubt the authorities
quoted.



Some don't have concrete criticism to offer but doubt the content because it
is not fresh from the oven.



Some criticise not the content but the writer.



Some criticise both the content and the writer, perceiving the writing as
personal insult.



It is for us to choose our own category.


-- 
Prof. M C Gupta
MD (Medicine), MPH,  LL.M.,

Advocate & Health and Medico-legal Consultant

mcgupta44@gmail.com
www.writing.com/authors/mcgupta44
http://mcgupta44.blogspot.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Never be haughty to the humble; never be humble to the haughty. 
-Jefferson Davis, confederate president (1808-1889)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To join/leave, use the form at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/#options
This list is archived at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html