Site directory | Today's news | Film reviews | likhaai | nukkad | Stocks | Discussion boards | Photos | Puzzles
Restaurant Guide | Train Guide | Bus Guide | Mumbai Information | Image Galleries

About us | Advertise here! | Feedback | Donate

Sponsored Links: Articles on travel within India and USA-specific tips | Are There Lucky Planets In Your Astrological Marriage House?

Mumbai-Central.com

Where Mumbaikars meet

Top: nukkad: archive: Thread Index



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[nukkad] I have good company when I criticise USA



 
[This message contained attachments that have been removed.]


International Herald Tribune

U.S. should go on diet of its own, India says
By Heather Timmons
Tuesday, May 13, 2008

NEW DELHI: Instead of blaming India and other developing nations for the
rise in food prices, Americans should rethink their energy policy and go
on a diet, say a growing number of politicians, economists and academics
here.

Criticism of the United States has ballooned in India recently,
particularly after the administration of President George W. Bush seemed
to blame India's increasing middle class and prosperity for rising food
prices. Critics from India seem to be asking one underlying question:
"Why do Americans think they deserve to eat more than Indians?"

The food problem has "clearly" been created by Americans, who are eating
50 percent more calories than the average person in India, said Pradeep
Mehta, the secretary general of CUTS Center for International Trade,
Economics and Environment, a private economic research organization
based in India with offices in Kenya, Zambia, Vietnam and Britain.

If Americans were to slim down to even the middle-class weight in India,
"many hungry people in sub-Saharan Africa would find food on their
plates," Mehta said. The money Americans spend on liposuction to get rid
of their excess fat could be funneled to famine victims instead, he
added.

Developing nations like China and India have long been blamed for
everything from the rising cost of commodities to global warming,
because they are consuming more goods and fuels than ever before. But
Indians from the prime minister's office on down never fail to point out
that per capita, India uses far fewer commodities and pollutes far less
than the West, and particularly the United States.

Many Indians felt that Bush's remarks on May 2 were more of the same,
though this time they seemed to breed a widespread sense of "We're not
going to take this anymore." During a news conference in Missouri, Bush
mentioned India's growing middle class, and said "when you start getting
wealth, you start demanding better nutrition and better food, and so
demand is high, and that causes the price to go up." This came on the
heels of a similar statement by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that
had already upset many in India.

Americans eat an average of 3,770 calories per capita a day, the highest
amount in the world, according to data from the UN Food and Agricultural
Organization, compared to 2,440 calories in India. They are also the
largest per capita consumers in any major economy of beef, the most
energy-intensive common food source, according to the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. The United States and Canada top the world in oil
consumption per person, according to the U.S. Energy Information
Administration.

"George Bush has never been known for his knowledge of economics,"
Jairam Ramesh, the minister of state for commerce, told The Press Trust
of India after Bush's remarks, which he said proved again how
"comprehensively wrong" Bush is.

"To say that demand for food in India is causing increase in global food
prices is completely wrong," Ramesh said.

Politicians and academics in India cite various other reasons: diversion
of arable land in the United States and Europe into ethanol production;
trade subsidies by the United States and Europe; and the dollar's
decline.

Subsidies to Western farmers have undercut agricultural production in
fertile areas of Africa for decades, Kamal Nath, India's minister for
commerce and industry, said by telephone. Meanwhile, he added, Americans
waste more food than people in many other countries, in part because
they buy in such large quantities.

The United States is responsible "many times more" than India for the
world food crisis because of its higher food consumption, said Ramesh
Chand, an economist with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research,
which advises India's government on farming policy.

The Bush administration responded to the criticism from India with calls
for a truce. Bush is a "great friend and admirer" of India, said David
Mulford, the U.S. ambassador to India. He added that he thought "this is
a time for increased cooperation among nations to solve this problem and
that hostile political commentary is not productive."

A White House spokesman, Scott Stanzel said, "We think it is a good
thing countries are developing, that more and more people have higher
standards of living."

Blaming India's growth is not only unfair but nonsensical, some
economists argue. Food prices have not been continually rising with the
growth of the developing world, said Ramgopal Agarwala, a former World
Bank economist and senior adviser at RIS, a research organization in New
Delhi.

"They were static until 2006, then in 2007 and 2008 there was a sudden
spark," he said. Meanwhile, India's boom has been happening over the
past decade. This is "not last year's phenomena," he said. "I don't know
who advised the president" on his recent comments, Agarwala said, but
his analysis is "subprime."

Bush's "ignorance on most matters is widely known and openly
acknowledged by his own countrymen," The Asian Age argued May 5 in an
editorial, but he must not be allowed to "get away" with an attempt to
"divert global attention from the truth by passing the buck on to
India."

Mehta said that his remarks on liposuction were meant to be tongue in
cheek but that "politically incorrect" attitudes like Bush's and Rice's
needed to be challenged. Rather than blaming India, Mehta said, the West
should be adjusting to the changing world. "If the developing world is
going to develop, demand is going to go up, and there are going to be
new political paradigms," he said.

Hari Kumar contributed reporting.


-- 
Prof. M C Gupta
MD (Medicine), MPH,  LL.M.,

Advocate & Health and Medico-legal Consultant

mcgupta44@gmail.com
www.writing.com/authors/mcgupta44
http://mcgupta44.blogspot.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is perfectly fine to compare apples and oranges when comparing an Orange 
3G mobile that's a video phone with Apple iChat which is also a video phone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To join/leave, use the form at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/#options
This list is archived at: http://www.mumbai-central.com/nukkad/archive.html



Subscribe to nukkad

Use the form below to subscribe or unsubscribe to the list.

Your e-mail:

Choice:
Subscribe
Un-subscribe


[Prev Page][Next Page]

Main Index | Thread Index

Site directory | Today's news | Film reviews | likhaai | nukkad | Stocks | Discussion boards | Photos | Puzzles
Restaurant Guide | Train Guide | Bus Guide | Mumbai Information | Image Galleries

About us | Advertise here! | Feedback
Donate

Sponsored Link: Are There Lucky Planets In Your Astrological Marriage House? | Articles on travel and USA-specific tips
Get notified about site updates
To get updates about the Mumbai-Central.com site via email (only 1-2 messages per month), sign up!





Created and maintained by us